Home/New York Court of Appeals/Morales v. Rothke

Morales v. Rothke

223 N.E.2d 50, 18 N.Y.2d 913, 276 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 951
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 1, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 223 N.E.2d 50 (Morales v. Rothke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales v. Rothke, 223 N.E.2d 50, 18 N.Y.2d 913, 276 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 951 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

[915]*915Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yak Voorhis and Scileppi. Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial as to plaintiffs, Felipe Morales and Louis M. Morales, on the ground that their contributory negligence was a question of fact for the jury (see Vanyo v. Salisbury, 16 N Y 2d 969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 N.E.2d 50, 18 N.Y.2d 913, 276 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-rothke-ny-1966.