Morales v. Richardson

475 F. App'x 894
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2012·No. No. 12-1324·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Morales appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims and its subsequent order denying his motion to amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morales v. Richardson, No. 8:11-ev-03215-JFM, 841 F.Supp.2d 908 (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012); (Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. Richardson, 475 F. App'x 894 (4th Cir. 2012).

475 F. App'x 894 (Morales v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. Maryland, 2026
Butler v. Crum
D. Maryland, 2022
Johnson v. Simmons
D. Maryland, 2021
Prince George's County v. Morales
149 A.3d 741 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2016)