Morales v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morales v. New York City Transit Authority

26 A.D.2d 690, 272 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 690 (Morales v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morales v. New York City Transit Authority, 26 A.D.2d 690, 272 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 22, 1965, in defendant’s favor upon the court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. Upon the entire record it cannot be fairly said that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie ease. The dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease was improper under these circumstances. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 22, 1965, in defendant’s favor upon the court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact have been considered. Upon the entire record it cannot be fairly said that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie ease. The dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s ease was improper under these circumstances. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 690, 272 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1966.