Morales v. MTLR Corp

S.D. New York

Morales v. MTLR Corp

DecidedDecember 11, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-10712

StatusUnknown

This text of Morales v. MTLR Corp (Morales v. MTLR Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morales v. MTLR Corp, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

: a SleopetalnentanevGal aaapee == □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK E YICALLY PiLED| ee ee ee eee ee ee eee ee eee ee ee HX Le HERIBERTO MORALES, ayers Plaintiff,

-against- 23-cv-10712 (LAK) MTLR CORP., etc., et al, Defendants est et esc ew ew ee ee ee ee et ee ewe eee HX

ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: Ww The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir, 1996). w The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 USS. 195 (1990). a The citizenship of one or more limited ae companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). wy The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. In addition, the notice has not been joined in by all defendants. Absent the filing, on or before December 21, 2023 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 11, 2023 Lewis A. Haplan United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

: a SleopetalnentanevGal aaapee == □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK E YICALLY PiLED| ee ee ee eee ee ee eee ee eee ee ee HX Le HERIBERTO MORALES, ayers Plaintiff,

-against- 23-cv-10712 (LAK) MTLR CORP., etc., et al, Defendants est et esc ew ew ee ee ee ee et ee ewe eee HX

ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: Ww The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir, 1996). w The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 USS. 195 (1990). a The citizenship of one or more limited ae companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). wy The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. In addition, the notice has not been joined in by all defendants. Absent the filing, on or before December 21, 2023 of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 11, 2023 Lewis A. Haplan United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Morales v. MTLR Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-mtlr-corp-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack