Morales v. Mobil Chemical

222 A.D.2d 1040, 635 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14093
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Plaintiff alleged a breach of an implied contract against her employer based upon her employer’s alleged failure to file a [1041] contemporaneous report of her on-the-job injury. Because the filing of an injury report is conduct regulated by the Workers’ Compensation Law (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 110), it "is subject to the protection of that law’s exclusivity” (Burlew v American Mut. Ins. Co., 63 NY2d 412, 416). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J. — Dismiss Complaint.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. Mobil Chemical, 222 A.D.2d 1040, 635 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1040 (Morales v. Mobil Chemical) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related