Morales v. Martinez

201 S.W.3d 415, 360 Ark. 382
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 20, 2005
Docket04-1353
StatusPublished

This text of 201 S.W.3d 415 (Morales v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales v. Martinez, 201 S.W.3d 415, 360 Ark. 382 (Ark. 2005).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Daniel Morales, by and through his attorney, Jay N. Tolley, moves this court for permission to file a belated petition for review. In his motion, filed December 20, 2004, Morales states that he now wishes to file his petition for review which was originally due on November 28, 2004. Morales asserts that his counsel is currently experiencing health problems and is undergoing extensive and ongoing treatment. Morales tendered his petition for review to this court’s clerk along with the instant motion.

In Porter v. State, 315 Ark. 160, 865 S.W.2d 300 (1993), we held that counsel’s admitted error in tendering a late petition for review was good cause to grant permission to file a belated petition for review. Likewise, we find that the appellant in the instant case has demonstrated good cause, and, accordingly, we grant him permission to file a belated petition for review.

Motion to file belated petition for review granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. State
865 S.W.2d 300 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 S.W.3d 415, 360 Ark. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-martinez-ark-2005.