Morales v. Hialeah Housing Authority

149 So. 3d 699, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14099, 2014 WL 4437242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2014·No. No. 3D13-1786·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

EMAS, J.

Upon our de novo review of the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of appellee, and considering the facts and inferences in a light most favorable to the non-moving party1, we conclude that genuine issues of material fact remain, precluding summary judgment. Rocamonde v. Marshalls of Ma, Inc., 56 So.3d 863, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Because we hold that summary judgment was inappropriate given the existence of genuine issues of material fact, we need not, and do not, reach the merits of the other issues raised in this appeal. See Albelo v. Southern Bell, 682 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. Hialeah Housing Authority, 149 So. 3d 699, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14099, 2014 WL 4437242 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

149 So. 3d 699 (Morales v. Hialeah Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez Sr. v. Taurus International Manufacturing
251 So. 3d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)