Morales v. Forfeiture of $220,000.00
739 So. 2d 709, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039
Opinion
Affirmed. See Munoz v. City of Coral Gables, 695 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that mere possession of currency is not legally determinative of possessory or ownership interest and is not sufficient to establish standing to contest civil forfeiture); United States v. $821,4-70.00 in U.S. Currency, 874 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir.1989) (“Unexplained naked possession of a cash hoard ... does not rise to the level of the possessory interest requisite for standing to attack the forfeiture proceeding.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morales v. Forfeiture of $220,000.00, 739 So. 2d 709, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
739 So. 2d 709 (Morales v. Forfeiture of $220,000.00) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. $321,470.00, United States Currency, Appeal of Michael Cambeletta, Movant-Appellant
874 F.2d 298 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Munoz v. City of Coral Gables
695 So. 2d 1283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)