Morales v. Coram Materials Corp.

64 A.D.3d 759, 882 N.Y.S.2d 655
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morales v. Coram Materials Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 51 A.D.3d 86

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated May 15, 2008, as granted that branch of the renewed motion of the defendant Coram Materials Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Although the defendant Coram Materials Corp. moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it based only on the General Obligations Law, upon our authority to search the record (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Dunham v Hilco Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 425, 429-430 [1996]) and for the reasons stated in our decision and order on the companion appeal (see Morales v Coram Materials Corp., 64 AD3d 756 [2009] [decided herewith]), we affirm the dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against Coram Materials Corp.

In light of the foregoing determination, the parties’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. Coram Materials Corp., 64 A.D.3d 759, 882 N.Y.S.2d 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

64 A.D.3d 759 (Morales v. Coram Materials Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.
676 N.E.2d 1178 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Morales v. Coram Materials Corp.
64 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)