Morales v. City of New York

132 A.D.2d 601, 517 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49141
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morales v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 A.D.2d 439

Opinion

In a proceeding for leave to file a late notice of claim, the City of New York and the Board of Education of the City of New York appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated February 18, 1986, as granted that branch of the petitioners’ application which was for leave to file a late notice of claim as to the infant petitioner’s cause of action.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It was a proper exercise of discretion to allow the infant petitioner to file a late notice of claim. The delay in serving the notice of claim did not substantially prejudice the appellants in this case (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. City of New York, 132 A.D.2d 601, 517 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

132 A.D.2d 601 (Morales v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 50
New York GMU § 50