Morales v. City of New York
This text of 29 A.D.2d 875 (Morales v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 14, 1966, which granted plaintiff’s motion to serve a complaint nunc pro tune, reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The delay in serving the complaint of over 58 months is inordinately long. Plaintiff’s excuse that his attorney misplaced the file is legally insufficient (Gallagher v. City of New York, 19 A D 2d 623; Steuerman v. Feinman, 19 A D 2d 847; Francisco V. Walgreen Eastern Co., 25 A D 2d 681). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.2d 875, 288 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1968.