Morales v. Barnhart

111 F. App'x 296
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2004·No. No. 04-40324·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Michael J. Morales appeals the affirmance of the Commissioner’s denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income. The Commissioner has filed an unopposed motion to remand for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

A remand pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) requires that this court also enter a judgment affirming, reversing, or modifying the Commissioner’s decision. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-97, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993). Therefore, we REVERSE the district court’s judgment, GRANT the motion to remand, and REMAND to the district court with instructions to remand to the Commissioner for rehearing.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morales v. Barnhart, 111 F. App'x 296 (5th Cir. 2004).

111 F. App'x 296 (Morales v. Barnhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related