Morales-Reyes v. Westchester County Department of Social Services

81 A.D.3d 831, 916 N.Y.S.2d 819
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 831 (Morales-Reyes v. Westchester County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morales-Reyes v. Westchester County Department of Social Services, 81 A.D.3d 831, 916 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Westchester County Department of Social Services, dated July 7, 2009, made after a hearing, which found the petitioner guilty of 16 charges of misconduct and/or incompetence, and terminated her employment.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

“In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence to support the determination” (Matter of Ward v Juettner, 63 AD3d 748, 748 [2009]; see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]). A reviewing court “may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by [the administrative agency] where the evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists” (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 444 [1987] [832]*832[internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Ward v Juettner, 63 AD3d at 748; Matter of Morris v Calderone, 49 AD3d 741, 742 [2008]). Here, substantial evidence supported the determination of the Westchester County Department of Social Services that the petitioner committed certain acts of misconduct.

The penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775, 776 [2004]; Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d at 38; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222 [1974]; Matter of Ward v Juettner, 63 AD3d at 748; Matter of Gustafson v Town of N. Castle, N.Y., 45 AD3d 766, 767 [2007]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 AD3d 489, 490 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Maselli v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ.
2024 NY Slip Op 05209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Guarnieri v. County of Rockland
2024 NY Slip Op 02194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Scott v. Westchester County
204 A.D.3d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Mundinger v. Smithtown Cent. Sch. Dist.
2017 NY Slip Op 5608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Moser v. Ramkissoon
2017 NY Slip Op 1366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Bosch v. City of Middletown, N.Y.
127 A.D.3d 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Martin v. Board of Trustees
86 A.D.3d 645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.3d 831, 916 N.Y.S.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morales-reyes-v-westchester-county-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-2011.