Moraga (Roy) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2022·No. 85481·Published

Opinion

Supreme Court OF Nevapa

(01 1947A eSB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ROY DANIELS MORAGA, No. 85481 Appellant, am,

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. NOV 10 2022

ELI

25 supped F COURT LV fw.

DEPUTY/CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL "

This is a pro se appeal from an “Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Production of Documents Under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USCA 512.” Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

pAg. kaat, ve de Hardesty ,

Aigo, a—— Stiglich Herndon

ce: Hon, Carolyn Ellsworth, Senior Judge Roy Daniels Moraga Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

20- OT KO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moraga (Roy) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Moraga (Roy) v. State (Moraga (Roy) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)