Mora v. State

957 So. 2d 1257, 2007 WL 1343671
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 2007
Docket3D06-324
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 957 So. 2d 1257 (Mora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mora v. State, 957 So. 2d 1257, 2007 WL 1343671 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

957 So.2d 1257 (2007)

Marcos A. MORA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 9, 2007.

Marcos A. Mora, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Olga L. Villa, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Marcos A. Mora, appeals the trial court's denial of the Rule 3.850 motions claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and newly discovered evidence. We have carefully reviewed the record, which includes the transcript of the trial court's evidentiary hearing on these issues, and affirm the trial court as the issues raised are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HERMELO v. State
957 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
957 So. 2d 1257, 2007 WL 1343671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mora-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.