Mora v. State

454 So. 2d 92, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1861, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 1984·No. No. 82-2457·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reject the defendant’s contention that his claim of self-defense was established as a matter of law. E.g., Darty v. State, 161 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 168 So.2d 147 (Fla.1964). Accordingly, the convictions for second degree-murder and attempted second degree-murder under review are affirmed. The sentences are modified, however, to the extent only of providing that the three-year minimum mandatory provisions imposed pursuant to Sec. 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981) shall be served concurrently rather than consecutively. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mora v. State, 454 So. 2d 92, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1861, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

454 So. 2d 92 (Mora v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darty v. State
161 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Parson v. State
450 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Whitehead v. State
446 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)