Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale

446 So. 2d 97, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2660
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 23, 1984·No. No. 63170·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla, 424 So.2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), on the basis of conflict with Griffis v. State, 356 So.2d 297 (Fla.1978), and One 1978 Lincoln Versailles v. State, 388 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). We granted discretionary review in accordance with article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. The thrust of petitioner’s argument is that there is no nexus between the felony drug operation and the vehicle. Having heard oral argument and considered petitioner’s arguments, it is clear that there is no direct and express conflict with either Griffis or One 1978 Lincoln Versailles. Discretionary jurisdiction is withdrawn as having been improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 446 So. 2d 97, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2660 (Fla. 1984).

446 So. 2d 97 (Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Forfeiture of One 1983 Lincoln
497 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Duckham v. State
478 So. 2d 347 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)