Mora v. Ashcroft
This text of 68 F. App'x 864 (Mora v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)®, we do not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of applications for cancellation of removal unless the petitioner asserts a colorable constitutional claim. Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.2001). We have repeatedly warned that “a petitioner may not create the jurisdiction that Congress chose to remove simply by cloaking an abuse of discretion argument in constitutional garb.” Id. at 1271. Because the Moras’ due process claim does just that, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
PETITION DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mora-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.