Moots v. State

189 S.W. 1198, 1916 WL 103
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 1, 1916·No. No. 4263·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of using abusive language; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $5. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing presented that can be considered in the absence of the evidence. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moots v. State, 189 S.W. 1198, 1916 WL 103 (Tex. 1916).

189 S.W. 1198 (Moots v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.