Moose v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas

180 S.W. 225
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1915·No. No. 9560·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PHILLIPS, C. J.

The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of error upon the ground that the jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Appeals over the case is final; the amount in controversy being such as to make the suit cognizable by the county court.

[1, 2] The suit was filed in the district court. It was one for the recovery of damages arising from the destruction of a house by fire. In the petition the damages are laid at $1,000, with interest from the date of the destruction of the house, June 2, 1913. In a suit of this character interest is recoverable only as a part of the damages. Baker v. Smelser, 88 Tex. 26, 29 S. W. 377, 33 L. R. A. 163; Railway Co. v. Rayzor, 172 S. W. 1103. Inclusive of .the interest sued for, the amount in controversy exceeds $1,000, and the case is therefore not one of which the county court would have had jurisdiction.

The motion is overruled.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moose v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas, 180 S.W. 225 (Tex. 1915).

180 S.W. 225 (Moose v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. Mathews
191 S.W. 559 (Texas Supreme Court, 1917)