Moose v. . Marks

21 S.E. 561, 116 N.C. 785
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 561 (Moose v. . Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moose v. . Marks, 21 S.E. 561, 116 N.C. 785 (N.C. 1895).

Opinion

Fairgloth, C. J. :

It is agreed all around that the debtor may direct the application of his payment, and on his failure to do so the creditor may make the applicatipn, and if he fails then the law will make it to the debt with least security.

Here, the plaintiff held a note for $600 in his right as executor against defendant and another for a less amount as assignee in his individual right; the latter holding however was unknown to the defendant. The plaintiff applies by letter for $75 “ as one of the heirs is in a strain and needs it very much.” The defendant answers “ Find check for $57.50. I will send you some more as soon as I can raise it,” which was equivalent to saying, “ I send you'this amount to relieve the heir in distress”, and in legal effect was a request to apply it on the-$600 note, and good faith required that it be done.

Judgment Ee ver sed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. Murray
79 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Thomas v. Bank of Beaufort
112 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Young v. . Alford
23 S.E. 973 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 561, 116 N.C. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moose-v-marks-nc-1895.