Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.
This text of 234 A.D. 620 (Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and resettled order reversed upon the law [621]*621and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion prejudicial errors were committed by the court in refusing to charge as requested at folio 1052 and in admitting in evidence plaintiff’s Exhibits 9-A, 9-B and 9-E. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moos-fur-dyeing-corp-v-brooklyn-edison-co-nyappdiv-1931.