Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.

230 A.D. 790

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 790 (Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moos Fur Dyeing Corp. v. Brooklyn Edison Co., 230 A.D. 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the event. We think that upon the undisputed facts the plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury on the question whether there was a contract between plaintiff and defendant for electric light and power in force on June 22, 1926, and whether defendant was estopped from denying plaintiff’s right to such service at the time it was discontinued by defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the event. We think that upon the undisputed facts the plaintiff was entitled to go to the jury on the question whether there was a contract between plaintiff and defendant for electric light and power in force on June 22, 1926, and whether defendant was estopped from denying plaintiff’s right to such service at the time it was discontinued by defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moos-fur-dyeing-corp-v-brooklyn-edison-co-nyappdiv-1930.