Moorman v. Tingle

481 A.2d 854, 505 Pa. 513
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 24, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

505 Pa. 513 (1984)
481 A.2d 854

Paul M. MOORMAN and Diana C. Moorman, husband and wife
v.
J.B. TINGLE and Alma Tingle, husband and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 14, 1984.
Decided September 24, 1984.

Susan H. Wilkie, Feldstein, Grinberg, Stein & McKee, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

Richard A. Bell, Clearfield, for appellees.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

*514 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.

McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moorman v. Tingle, 481 A.2d 854, 505 Pa. 513 (Pa. 1984).

481 A.2d 854 (Moorman v. Tingle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael T.L v. Marilyn J.L.
525 A.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)