Moorman v. Tingle
481 A.2d 854, 505 Pa. 513
Opinion
Paul M. MOORMAN and Diana C. Moorman, husband and wife
v.
J.B. TINGLE and Alma Tingle, husband and wife, Appellants.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Susan H. Wilkie, Feldstein, Grinberg, Stein & McKee, Pittsburgh, for appellants.
Richard A. Bell, Clearfield, for appellees.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
*514 ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.
McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moorman v. Tingle, 481 A.2d 854, 505 Pa. 513 (Pa. 1984).
481 A.2d 854 (Moorman v. Tingle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michael T.L v. Marilyn J.L.
525 A.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)