Moorman v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.
This text of 2010 Ohio 3788 (Moorman v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Moorman v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 2010-Ohio-3788.]
Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
SCOTT MOORMAN
Plaintiff
v.
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Defendant
Case No. 2009-07814-AD
Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert
ENTRY OF DISMISSAL
{¶ 1} On September 25, 2009, plaintiff, Scott Moorman, filed a complaint against defendant, Department of Transportation. On March 3, 2010, defendant filed an investigation report. On March 19, 2010, plaintiff submitted a letter indicating he wished to dismiss his claim since he, “received remedy from the Village of Cleves.” Plaintiff’s letter is considered a motion for voluntary dismissal and is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED. The court shall absorb the court costs of this case.
________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc: Case No. 2009-07814-AD -2- ENTRY
Scott Moorman Jolene M. Molitoris, Director 602 Coleberry Court Department of Transportation Cleves, Ohio 45002 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43223 DRB/laa Filed 4/2/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 8/13/10
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 Ohio 3788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moorman-v-ohio-dept-of-transp-ohioctcl-2010.