Moorman v. Moorman

577 So. 2d 726, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3637, 1991 WL 60022
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1991·No. No. 90-01018·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. At issue is the award of child support. On review of the record and briefs of the parties herein, we conclude that the case must be remanded so that the trial court can set forth the basis for his decision to impute ten hours of additional income to appellant, the payee spouse who has primary residential responsibility for five children and presently works 30 hours per week. Haas v. Haas, 552 So.2d 221, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Mosbarger v. Mosbarger, 547 So.2d 188, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

ERVIN, BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moorman v. Moorman, 577 So. 2d 726, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3637, 1991 WL 60022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

577 So. 2d 726 (Moorman v. Moorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haas v. Haas
552 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Mosbarger v. Mosbarger
547 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)