Moorman v. Moorman

577 So. 2d 726, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3637, 1991 WL 60022
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1991
DocketNo. 90-01018
StatusPublished

This text of 577 So. 2d 726 (Moorman v. Moorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moorman v. Moorman, 577 So. 2d 726, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3637, 1991 WL 60022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment of dissolution. At issue is the award of child support. On review of the record and briefs of the parties herein, we conclude that the case must be remanded so that the trial court can set forth the basis for his decision to impute ten hours of additional income to appellant, the payee spouse who has primary residential responsibility for five children and presently works 30 hours per week. Haas v. Haas, 552 So.2d 221, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Mosbarger v. Mosbarger, 547 So.2d 188, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

ERVIN, BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haas v. Haas
552 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Mosbarger v. Mosbarger
547 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 So. 2d 726, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3637, 1991 WL 60022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moorman-v-moorman-fladistctapp-1991.