Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.

216 A.D.2d 958, 629 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7364

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1995·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because plaintiff has sufficient information to determine the identities of the prospective defendants to enable him to draft a complaint without the examination he seeks, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for preaction disclosure (see, Gorgoni v Rapson, 166 AD2d 901; see also, CPLR 3102 [c]; Liberty Imports v Bourguet, 146 AD2d 535, 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Strobridge, J.—Disclosure.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because plaintiff has sufficient information to determine the identities of the prospective defendants to enable him to draft a complaint without the examination he seeks, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for preaction disclosure (see, Gorgoni v Rapson, 166 AD2d 901; see also, CPLR 3102 [c]; Liberty Imports v Bourguet, 146 AD2d 535, 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Strobridge, J.—Disclosure.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co., 216 A.D.2d 958, 629 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

216 A.D.2d 958 (Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related