Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.

Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.

216 A.D.2d 958, 629 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7364
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 958 (Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moorman v. K.M. Davies Co., 216 A.D.2d 958, 629 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because plaintiff has sufficient information to determine the identities of the prospective defendants to enable him to draft a complaint without the examination he seeks, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for preaction disclosure (see, Gorgoni v Rapson, 166 AD2d 901; see also, CPLR 3102 [c]; Liberty Imports v Bourguet, 146 AD2d 535, 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wayne County, Strobridge, J.—Disclosure.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Imports, Inc. v. Bourguet
146 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Gorgoni v. Rapson
166 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.D.2d 958, 629 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moorman-v-km-davies-co-nyappdiv-1995.