Mooring v. . Stanton

Superior Court of North Carolina

Mooring v. . Stanton

1 N.C. 70

DecidedSeptember 5, 1795

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 70 (Mooring v. . Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mooring v. . Stanton, 1 N.C. 70 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).

Pincite

Opinion

On a plea of the statute of gaming. 1788, 5, 633. Money lent to play with, or to pay, at the time of loss, is not recoverable. But it is otherwise of a gaming debt paid by a third person, at the request of the loser.

NOTE. — See Act of 1788 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 51), and the cases upon the construction of it, Anonymous, 3 N.C. 231; Stowell v. Guthrie, ibid., 297; Hodges v. Pitman, 4 N.C. 276; Turner v. Peacock, 13 N.C. 303;Hudspeth v. Wilson, ibid., 372; Dunn v. Holloway, 16 N.C. 322.

(71)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On a plea of the statute of gaming. 1788, 5, 633. Money lent to play with, or to pay, at the time of loss, is not recoverable. But it is otherwise of a gaming debt paid by a third person, at the request of the loser.

NOTE. — See Act of 1788 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 51), and the cases upon the construction of it, Anonymous, 3 N.C. 231; Stowell v. Guthrie, ibid., 297; Hodges v. Pitman, 4 N.C. 276; Turner v. Peacock, 13 N.C. 303;Hudspeth v. Wilson, ibid., 372; Dunn v. Holloway, 16 N.C. 322.

(71)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mooring-v-stanton-ncsuperct-1795.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack