Mooring v. . Stanton
1 N.C. 70
Opinion
On a plea of the statute of gaming. 1788, 5, 633. Money lent to play with, or to pay, at the time of loss, is not recoverable. But it is otherwise of a gaming debt paid by a third person, at the request of the loser.
NOTE. — See Act of 1788 (1 Rev. Stat., ch. 51), and the cases upon the construction of it, Anonymous,
(71)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mooring v. . Stanton, 1 N.C. 70 (N.C. Ct. App. 1795).
1 N.C. 70 (Mooring v. . Stanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodges v. . Pitman
4 N.C. 276 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1816)
Turner v. . Peacock
13 N.C. 303 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1830)
Anonymous
3 N.C. 231 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1803)
Dunn v. . Holloway
16 N.C. 322 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1829)