Moores v. Townshend

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 893
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant being in possession of the premises, claiming under a lease, and there being no proof as to the value of the lease under which [894]*894he claimed title, and the lease being the subject matter of the litigation there-was no proof as to the value of the' subject matter, and consequently no basis for an allowance The granting of an allowance was therefore improper

The insertion in thu judgment of the statement that the complaint was dismissed upon the merits seems also to have been without warrant, as the plaintiff substantially submitted to a dismissal of the complaint upon the trial and there was no adjudication upon the merits

The judgment appealed from should therefore be modified by striking therefrom the words on the merits ’ and as so modified affirmed, with taxable, costs only, in the court below, and without costs of the appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moores v. Townshend, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 893 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 893 (Moores v. Townshend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.