Moorehead v. State

241 S.W.3d 834, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1722, 2007 WL 4390467

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Moorehead (hereinafter, “Mov-ant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his trial counsel denied him effective assistance of counsel by failing to prove he was incarcerated from September 29, 1999, through June 26, 2000, and failing to impeach the victim’s testimony.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Middleton v. State, 80 S.W.3d 799 (Mo. banc 2002). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).