Moorehead v. State

871 S.W.2d 137, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 351, 1994 WL 57682
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 1994·No. No. 64276·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moorehead v. State, 871 S.W.2d 137, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 351, 1994 WL 57682 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

871 S.W.2d 137 (Moorehead v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.