Moore v. Ziegler

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Ziegler

547 F. App'x 204

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2013·No. No. 13-6871·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ethan Jerome Moore, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Ziegler, No. 5:11-cv-00521, 2013 WL 2297048 (S.D.W.Va. May 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ethan Jerome Moore, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Ziegler, No. 5:11-cv-00521, 2013 WL 2297048 (S.D.W.Va. May 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Moore v. Ziegler, 547 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 204 (Moore v. Ziegler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related