Moore v. Zahn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Moore v. Zahn

106 P. 1011, 81 Kan. 904, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 455

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 8, 1910

DocketNo. 16,247

StatusPublished

This text of 106 P. 1011 (Moore v. Zahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Zahn, 106 P. 1011, 81 Kan. 904, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 455 (kan 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellant has no foundation upon which to rest his main contentions. The evidence relating to alteration was introduced without objection, and the case was tried on the theory that such evidence supported the answer. If, however, this were not true, the following cases are decisive against him: Thrashing Machine Co. v. Peterson, 51 Kan. 713; Kurth v. Bank, 77 Kan. 475, 478; White v. Smith, 79 Kan. 96, 101.

The evidence is ample to sustain the verdict, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appellant has no foundation upon which to rest his main contentions. The evidence relating to alteration was introduced without objection, and the case was tried on the theory that such evidence supported the answer. If, however, this were not true, the following cases are decisive against him: Thrashing Machine Co. v. Peterson, 51 Kan. 713; Kurth v. Bank, 77 Kan. 475, 478; White v. Smith, 79 Kan. 96, 101.

The evidence is ample to sustain the verdict, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 P. 1011, 81 Kan. 904, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-zahn-kan-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack