Moore v. Woodside

26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 537
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1875·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

The question presented is whether such a judgment and proceeding are authorized by section 376 of the code of civil procedure, as amended March 13, 1872 (69 Ohio L. 44). We think they were. The defense is, in fact, a counter-claim, and not a mere denial of the amount of damages. The defendant, in effect, sets up a warranty of the goods, and a breach of that warranty, resulting in damages less in amount than the price agreed to be paid for the goods. We think such a case comes fairly within the intent and meaning of the section referred to.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Woodside, 26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 537 (Ohio 1875).

26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 537 (Moore v. Woodside) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.