Moore v. Wise

20 Ga. 411
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1856
DocketNo. 73
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ga. 411 (Moore v. Wise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Wise, 20 Ga. 411 (Ga. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The motion for the new trial was put on these grounds:

That the verdict was contrary to law.

That it was contrary to the evidence and to the justice of the case.

There is nothing in the case to make the verdict contrary to law or the justice of the case, unless it be true that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The only question, therefore, is, was the verdict contrary to the evidence ?

•"""In order to authorize this Court to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, it is necessary that the verdict should be one which is “ decidedly and strongly against the weight” of the evidence — one in favor of which there is only “ some slight evidence.” (Acts 1853-4, 47.)

This, we think, is not such a verdict. There is a good [415]*415deal of evidence in favor of this verdict — perhaps as much as. there is against it.

"We must, therefore, affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ga. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-wise-ga-1856.