Moore v. Washington

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided April 2, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-11506·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN MOORE II ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:23-cv-11506

v. Honorable Susan K. DeClercq United States District Judge HEIDI WASHINGTON ET AL., Honorable Patricia T. Morris Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge _________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On January 30, 2024, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a report recommending that this Court deny Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ECF No. 29. Judge Morris provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Morris’s findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 29, is ADOPTED, and that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 24, is DENIED.

Dated: 4/2/2024 s/Susan K. DeClercq SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Washington, (E.D. Mich. 2024).

Moore v. Washington (Moore v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Randy Berkshire v. Debra Dahl
928 F.3d 520 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)