Moore v. Walton
117 S.E. 743, 155 Ga. 481, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 100
Opinion
The exception in this case is to the first grant of a new trial; and therefore, in order to determine whether the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded, a proper brief of the evidence is essential. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists, in the main, of a full stenographic report of the testimony, containing all of the questions to the witnesses and their answei's. This is not a sufficient compliance with the statute; and therefore the judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Walton, 117 S.E. 743, 155 Ga. 481, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 100 (Ga. 1923).
117 S.E. 743 (Moore v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. Turner
54 S.E.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
James v. State
37 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Progressive Life Insurance v. Wallace
6 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)