Moore v. Walker

108 S.E. 809, 27 Ga. App. 428, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 943
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1921
Docket12528
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 809 (Moore v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Walker, 108 S.E. 809, 27 Ga. App. 428, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 943 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Title to agricultural products sold by planters and commission merchants does not pass to the buyer until fully paid for. Civil Code (1910), § 4126.

2. A check is not payment until it is paid, unless the payee accepts it as such. Civil Code (1910), § 4314; Butler v. Barnes, 8 Ga. App. 513 (69 S. E. 923); Holland v. Mutual Fertilizer Co., 8 Ga. App. 714 (70 S. E. 151); Kirby Planing Mill Co. v. Titus, 14 Ga. App. 1 (80 S. E. 18).

3. Applying the foregoing principles to the instant case, which was a trover action to recover a carload of melons, the plaintiff had no title to the property sued for, since the undisputed evidence adduced upon the trial shows that the check given by him to the defendant (a farmer) for the purchase-price of the melons was neither accepted as payment nor cashed; and, therefore, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff must be set aside as being contrary to law and the evidence.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Trover; from city court of Amerieus — Judge Harper. May 11, 1921. Bradley Hogg, for plaintiffs in error. C. R. McCrory, Shipp & Sheppard, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Turbidy
183 S.E.2d 363 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Council v. Nunn
153 S.E. 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E. 809, 27 Ga. App. 428, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-walker-gactapp-1921.