Moore v. Wait
1 Binn. 219, 1807 Pa. LEXIS 52
Opinions
The jurisdiction of the justice is founded on the act of Assembly; and having exceeded that jurisdiction, the judgment is erroneous. On the appeal every objection on the law or the merits was open to the appellant; and it appearing to the Common Pleas on the face of the record that the judgment of the justice was erroneous, it was their duty to arrest the judgment, although this matter was not pleaded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. Wait, 1 Binn. 219, 1807 Pa. LEXIS 52 (Pa. 1807).
1 Binn. 219 (Moore v. Wait) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowell Office Equipment v. Krug
247 A.2d 657 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. Silver
12 Pa. D. & C. 670 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1929)
Fox v. Nachtsheim
29 P. 140 (Washington Supreme Court, 1892)
Reitze v. Meadville & L. Ry. Co.
17 A. 663 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)
Deihm v. Snell
13 A. 283 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
State ex rel. Williamson v. Judges of the Court of Common Pleas
42 N.J.L. 386 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1880)
Commonwealth v. O'Neil
72 Mass. 343 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1856)
Crabtree v. Cliatt
22 Ala. 181 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1853)
Barker v. Baxter
1 Pin. 407 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1844)
Jim v. State
3 Mo. 147 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1832)
Holden v. Wiggins
3 Pen. & W. 469 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1832)
Wright v. Guy
10 Serg. & Rawle 227 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1823)
Morrison v. Weaver
4 Serg. & Rawle 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1818)
M'Laughlin v. Parker
3 Serg. & Rawle 144 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1817)
Owen v. Shelhamer
3 Binn. 45 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1810)