Moore v. Vogel

Texas Supreme Court

Moore v. Vogel

93 Tex. 419

Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 1900·No. Application No. 2567; Application No. 2568·Published

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

In refusing the” applications for writ of error in this case, we deem it proper to say that we concur in the conclusion of the trial judge, that the sale of the land by Harrar, administrator, to Vogel passed the title of the intestate to the latter, and that we have not found it necessary to pass upon the other questions discussed in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. The applications for writ of error are refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GAINES, Chief Justice.

In refusing the” applications for writ of error in this case, we deem it proper to say that we concur in the conclusion of the trial judge, that the sale of the land by Harrar, administrator, to Vogel passed the title of the intestate to the latter, and that we have not found it necessary to pass upon the other questions discussed in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. The applications for writ of error are refused.

Moore v. Vogel, 93 Tex. 419 (Tex. 1900).

Pincite

93 Tex. 419 (Moore v. Vogel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.