Moore v. United States

Supreme Court

Moore v. United States

316 U.S. 642, 62 S. Ct. 1036

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 13, 1942·No. No. 1074·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from

the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

Per Curiam:

The mo[643]*643tion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Maher, 307 U. S. 148, 153-154; United States v. Rosenblum Truck Lines, 315 U. S. 50; Lubetich v. United States, 315 U. S. 57.

Messrs. Ernest A. Michel and Thomas Walsh for appellant. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from

the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

Per Curiam:

The mo[643]*643tion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Maher, 307 U. S. 148, 153-154; United States v. Rosenblum Truck Lines, 315 U. S. 50; Lubetich v. United States, 315 U. S. 57.

Messrs. Ernest A. Michel and Thomas Walsh for appellant. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for respondents.

Moore v. United States, 316 U.S. 642, 62 S. Ct. 1036 (1942).

Pincite

316 U.S. 642 (Moore v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related