Moore v. United States
This text of 188 F.2d 471 (Moore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful examination of the rec-' ord in this case impels the conclusion that abundant evidence supports the verdict, and that appellant’s conviction and sentence should be sustained. There was no error in the failure of the trial court to grant the motion for a bill of particulars and for a continuance. Wong Tai v. U. S., 273 U.S. 77, 82, 47 S.Ct. 300, 71 L.Ed. 545; Hart v. U.S., 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 128. Moreover, we find no reversible error either in the rulings on the evidence or in the denial of the motion to suppress the evidence. U. S. v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 60, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653. Carroll v. U. S., 267 U.S. 132, 156-157, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F.2d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-united-states-ca5-1951.