Moore v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Moore v. United States

188 F.2d 471

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 30, 1951·No. 13464_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the rec-' ord in this case impels the conclusion that abundant evidence supports the verdict, and that appellant’s conviction and sentence should be sustained. There was no error in the failure of the trial court to grant the motion for a bill of particulars and for a continuance. Wong Tai v. U. S., 273 U.S. 77, 82, 47 S.Ct. 300, 71 L.Ed. 545; Hart v. U.S., 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 128. Moreover, we find no reversible error either in the rulings on the evidence or in the denial of the motion to suppress the evidence. U. S. v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 60, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653. Carroll v. U. S., 267 U.S. 132, 156-157, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the rec-' ord in this case impels the conclusion that abundant evidence supports the verdict, and that appellant’s conviction and sentence should be sustained. There was no error in the failure of the trial court to grant the motion for a bill of particulars and for a continuance. Wong Tai v. U. S., 273 U.S. 77, 82, 47 S.Ct. 300, 71 L.Ed. 545; Hart v. U.S., 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 128. Moreover, we find no reversible error either in the rulings on the evidence or in the denial of the motion to suppress the evidence. U. S. v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 60, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653. Carroll v. U. S., 267 U.S. 132, 156-157, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543.

Affirmed.

Moore v. United States, 188 F.2d 471 (5th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

188 F.2d 471 (Moore v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related