Moore v. United States

188 F.2d 471
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 1951
Docket13464_1
StatusPublished

This text of 188 F.2d 471 (Moore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. United States, 188 F.2d 471 (5th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the rec-' ord in this case impels the conclusion that abundant evidence supports the verdict, and that appellant’s conviction and sentence should be sustained. There was no error in the failure of the trial court to grant the motion for a bill of particulars and for a continuance. Wong Tai v. U. S., 273 U.S. 77, 82, 47 S.Ct. 300, 71 L.Ed. 545; Hart v. U.S., 5 Cir., 112 F.2d 128. Moreover, we find no reversible error either in the rulings on the evidence or in the denial of the motion to suppress the evidence. U. S. v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 60, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653. Carroll v. U. S., 267 U.S. 132, 156-157, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. United States
267 U.S. 132 (Supreme Court, 1925)
Wong Tai v. United States
273 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1927)
United States v. Rabinowitz
339 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Hart v. United States
112 F.2d 128 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F.2d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-united-states-ca5-1951.