Moore v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moore v. Travis

51 A.D.3d 1180, 857 N.Y.S.2d 355

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 51 A.D.3d 1180 (Moore v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Travis, 51 A.D.3d 1180, 857 N.Y.S.2d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.), entered August 16, 2007 in Albany County, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate a prior judgment.

The facts underlying the instant appeal are fully set forth in our prior decision (304 AD2d 1001 [2003], affd 2 NY3d 748 [2004]). Currently, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.) that denied his motion to vacate a judgment of said court (Kane, J.), entered April 16, 2002, which dismissed the proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging, as is relevant here, respondent’s denial of his request for expungement of erroneous information from his parole files. However, the Attorney General has advised that, subsequent to the entry of the order at issue, the Division of Parole commenced a complete review of petitioner’s files for the purpose of correcting any erroneous information they may contain concerning his role in the May 25, 1982 burglary. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mathie v Selsky, 45 AD3d 1169, 1170 [2007]; Matter of Eves v New York State Div. of Parole, 39 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2007]).

Mercure, J.P, Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.), entered August 16, 2007 in Albany County, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate a prior judgment.

The facts underlying the instant appeal are fully set forth in our prior decision (304 AD2d 1001 [2003], affd 2 NY3d 748 [2004]). Currently, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.) that denied his motion to vacate a judgment of said court (Kane, J.), entered April 16, 2002, which dismissed the proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging, as is relevant here, respondent’s denial of his request for expungement of erroneous information from his parole files. However, the Attorney General has advised that, subsequent to the entry of the order at issue, the Division of Parole commenced a complete review of petitioner’s files for the purpose of correcting any erroneous information they may contain concerning his role in the May 25, 1982 burglary. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mathie v Selsky, 45 AD3d 1169, 1170 [2007]; Matter of Eves v New York State Div. of Parole, 39 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2007]).

Mercure, J.P, Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.3d 1180, 857 N.Y.S.2d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-travis-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack