Moore v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moore v. Travis

251 A.D.2d 940, 675 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 940 (Moore v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. Travis, 251 A.D.2d 940, 675 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the State Board of Parole which denied petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the denial of his application for parole release. The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been annulled and a new Parole Board appearance has been scheduled. This proceeding is therefore dismissed as moot (see, e.g., Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867; see generally, Matter of Hough v New York State Bd. of Parole, 235 AD2d 862, lv dismissed 90 NY2d 884).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the State Board of Parole which denied petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the denial of his application for parole release. The Attorney-General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been annulled and a new Parole Board appearance has been scheduled. This proceeding is therefore dismissed as moot (see, e.g., Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867; see generally, Matter of Hough v New York State Bd. of Parole, 235 AD2d 862, lv dismissed 90 NY2d 884).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 940, 675 N.Y.S.2d 913, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-travis-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack