Moore v. Tillman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 27, 2009
• Docket: 08-8453
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8453

EDDIE MOORE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RUDOLPH TILLMAN, in his individual capacity; JANICE MONTGOMERY, in her individual capacity; WILLIAM WHITE, in his individual capacity; DONALD DRISKILL, in his individual capacity; DENISE HINSON, in her individual capacity; GLENN S. SHERMAN, in his individual capacity; CHARLES YATES, in his individual capacity; GLENDA ROBINSON, in her individual capacity; MARSHALL CLEMENT SANFORD, JR., in his individual capacity; ROBERT M. STEVENSON, in his individual and official capacity; JON OZMINT, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:07-cv-03209-RBH)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Barnwell McMaster, John Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina; David Michael Tatarsky, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Eddie Moore appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore

v. Tillman, No. 3:07-cv-03209-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2008;

Sept. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED