Moore v. Talbert
This text of Moore v. Talbert (Moore v. Talbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8286
TERRY MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE TALBERT; HUGH MARTIN; HATTIE PIMPONG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:08-ct-3024-D)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Terry Moore appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Moore v. Talbert, No. 5:08-ct-3024-D
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moore v. Talbert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-talbert-ca4-2009.