Moore v. Strickland
This text of Moore v. Strickland (Moore v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7633
JESSIE A. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KEVIN STRICKLAND, Police Detective; DEAN MURPHY, Supervisor; DAVID BYORLIN, District Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-05-426-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 7, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jessie A. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jessie A. Moore appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Strickland, No.
CA-05-426-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moore v. Strickland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-strickland-ca4-2006.