Moore v. Strickland

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Strickland

174 F. App'x 779

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2006·No. No. 05-7633·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jessie A. Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Strickland, No. CA-05-426-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [780]*780adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jessie A. Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Strickland, No. CA-05-426-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are [780]*780adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Moore v. Strickland, 174 F. App'x 779 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

174 F. App'x 779 (Moore v. Strickland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related