Moore v. Strickland
This text of 21 So. 2d 665 (Moore v. Strickland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We are of opinion that the Act of March 26, 1936, General & Local Acts, Extra Session, 1936, p. 29, amending the Act of 1931, amendatory of Section 5742 of the Code of 1923, Code 1940, Tit. 61, § 81, by the substitution of the word “satisfactory” for the word “fit”, worked no change in the meaning of the statute, as previously construed, and, therefore, the probate court was without discretion to consider any olher disqualifications than those set down in § 69, Tit. 61, Code 1940.
Therefore, the court erred in denying the appellant’s application for the removal of appellee, and for his own appointment.
Original opinion withdrawn, rehearing granted, decree of the probate court reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 So. 2d 665, 246 Ala. 624, 1945 Ala. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-strickland-ala-1945.