Moore v. State

34 S.W.2d 889, 116 Tex. Crim. 633, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 837
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 1930·No. No. 13699.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

Offense, felony theft; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

A Ford Coupe belonging to Dr. Hedrick of Abilene was stolen. Shortly thereafter appellant delivered this same automobile to a young lady, who retained possession of same until it was found and taken by the officers. She testified it was delivered to her by appellant to be used and kept by her.

No bills of exception appear in the record. The evidence showing possession of the stolen car in appellant recently after its theft and there appearing no facts sufficient to rebut the inference arising therefrom that it was unlawfully taken by him, the evidence was in our opinion sufficient. This evidence appears to meet the requirements of the well known rule in such cases. Branch’s P. C., Sec. 2463; Cases v. State, 12 Tex. Ct. App. 59; Lehman v. State, 18 Tex. Ct. App. 174.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Jtidges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Hawkins, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 34 S.W.2d 889, 116 Tex. Crim. 633, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 837 (Tex. 1930).

34 S.W.2d 889 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. State
106 S.W.2d 1054 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)