Moore v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Moore v. State

37 Tex. 133

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 Tex. 133 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 37 Tex. 133 (Tex. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The first objection to the bail bond is not well taken. The law does not require as great particularity in a bond taken by a committing magistrate, as it does in a bond taken before the District Court after indictment found. But under the authority of The State v. Russell, 24 Texas, 505, we must [134]*134decide that the magistrate, before whom the party had been committed, had no authority after the- adjournment of his court, to take and approve a bail bond. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden, J.

The first objection to the bail bond is not well taken. The law does not require as great particularity in a bond taken by a committing magistrate, as it does in a bond taken before the District Court after indictment found. But under the authority of The State v. Russell, 24 Texas, 505, we must [134]*134decide that the magistrate, before whom the party had been committed, had no authority after the- adjournment of his court, to take and approve a bail bond. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Tex. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-tex-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack